The enforcement landscape under the Competition Act 2010 continues to mature, with MyCC refining its approach to penalties and cartel detection. This final part of the MyCC Guidelines Series will delve into the Guidelines on Financial Penalties and the Guidelines on Leniency Regime. These guidelines clarify how penalties are assessed and how enterprises may benefit from leniency in cartel investigations. This article examines both guidelines.
The MyCC’s Guidelines on Market Definition clarify how markets are defined under the Competition Act 2010 and provide valuable insight into the analytical framework applied in investigations under Chapters 1 and 2 of the Act. For businesses operating in Malaysia, understanding this framework is critical, as market definition often shapes the outcome of a competition assessment.
This third instalment turns to a more practical question: how do competition concerns actually reach the Malaysia Competition Commission (‘MyCC’). Understanding MyCC’s complaint procedures is critical not only for complainants, but also for businesses seeking to manage regulatory risk and respond strategically to potential investigations.
Chapter 2 of the Competition Act 2010 prohibits enterprises from abusing a dominant position in any market for goods or services in Malaysia. The objective is to prevent conduct that distorts competition and harms consumers, while allowing legitimate competitive behaviour.
This first instalment unpacks the core concepts behind Chapter 1, explains what qualifies as an “agreement”, and highlights the types of conduct that are automatically treated as prohibited cartel behaviour.
The Malaysia Competition Commission (‘MyCC’) is an independent body established under the Competition Commission Act 2010 to enforce the Competition Act 2010. The main role of MyCC is to protect the competitive process, benefiting businesses, consumers and the economy. Pursuant to s 66 of the Competition Act 2010, MyCC has the power to issue guidelines for the better carrying out of the provisions of the Competition Act 2010. These guidelines provide guidance on economic and legal analysis to be used in determining cases and principles to be used in determining any penalty or remedy imposed under the Competition Act.
The respondent, a Turkish company, exported steel reinforcing bar (‘rebar’) into Malaysia through its intermediary. The Malaysian Steel Association petitioned to the Minister of International Trade and Industry (‘second appellant’), pursuant to the Countervailing and Anti-Dumping Duties Act 1993 (‘the CADD’), to conduct an anti-dumping investigation on rebar from Singapore and Turkey.
The Review of eCommerce Legislation Final Report (Laporan Akhir Kajian Semakan Semula Perundangan eDagang) (‘the report’) represents a major national effort to modernise, refresh and renew the legal and regulatory framework for online commerce in Malaysia. Led by the Ministry of Domestic Trade and Cost of Living (‘KPDN’) with input from over 90 stakeholders, the report provides a comprehensive evaluation of existing eCommerce laws, identifies key enforcement and consumer protection gaps, and sets out a structured plan for reform. Richard Wee Chambers (a member of Grandall Law Firm) are the legal advisors in this Review of eCommerce Legislation.
The rapid growth of digital markets, especially in e-commerce and multi-sided platform business, has raised significant concerns about unfair trade practices and monopolistic acts.
On 19 August 2025, the Trade Competition Commission of Thailand released the Draft Guidelines for Considering Unfair Trade Practices and Monopolistic Acts in Multi-Sided Platform Business, Digital Services, and E-Commerce to address these issues. The Draft Guideline establishes four principles and identifies two main categories of potentially anti-competitive conduct and unfair trade practices.
Written by Magdalene Lee, Goh Jia Ni and Ashley Yip. Introduction A Draft Final Report: Public Consultation (Briefing Notes) on the Market Review on the Digital Economy Ecosystem under the Competition Act 2010 (“the review”)…
